To Catch A Jackrabbit

 

 

     To catch a mature, healthy jackrabbit the hare must be “run down.” By this I mean the jack must be pursued hard enough and long enough that, approaching exhaustion, its speed and reflexes are failing to the point that a hound may make contact with the hare with its mouth and knock it over, trip it up, pick it up, or “put it on the ground.” The first requirement is for the hound to have more speed than the hare; without sufficient pace the chase is futile. But speed by itself isn’t enough. Rarely can a hare be picked up on the first or second pass. Indeed, a good jack can elude hounds indefinitely, even if the dogs are clearly faster, unless and until she begins to tire. Then she becomes vulnerable.

     The hare will not become vulnerable unless she is pressed hard; forced into a strong sprint and numerous turns. She won’t make defined wrenches and turns on her own; if she’s changing direction sharply you know your hounds are making her work. You’ll also know your hounds are making the hare work if she lays her ears back on the run. If she’s cruising along straightaway with her ears up she’s not working; she will not tire and she will not be caught.

     Pressed hard, some hares become vulnerable inside 500 yards; some at 1000 yards; some at two miles; many not at all! So the hounds must press the hare hard enough and long enough to make her lay her ears back, make her change direction, and, finally, make her wear down.

     It helps immensely if the hounds can stay close to the hare through the turns. If the hound is taking twenty yards to make a turn the hare made in five, he’ll likely wear down before the hare. The ability of the hound to stay close to the hare through the turns is a function of intelligence (controlled pace) as well as athletic ability. Some hounds seem to be able to do it instinctively right from the first race. Others learn in time. Some never learn.

     The hare knows just when to change direction before the closing hound can pick her up. Just before she makes the turn or wrench, or 180 or 360 degree maneuver, she’ll raise her ears. Good hounds know this signal and are anticipating the turn; the hare dekes or jinks or dodges — there is no limit to their variable moves — and the dust powders into the air as the hound brakes from 40 mph, leans, then powers through the turn still close to the line of pursuit. Of course, once she has made her turn, the hare again lays her ears back as she regains her line and sprint.


Zeke, coldblood greyhound, is changing gaits – “shifting gears” – at high speed as he prepares to drop for a take on the hare. Note head cocked to the left toward the game; tale is counter-balanced to the right. He missed the take!

 

     Hounds, too, have signals that indicate a turn. A hound about to change direction at high speed will raise its tail to help slow itself; if the turn is to the right the tail will then swing to the left as a counter balance to the head and body leaning hard the other way; or visa versa when the hare and hound go hard left; and coming out of the turn the tail is lowered as the hound once again lines out on the hare.

     Speed and agility on a course can be seen if not measured but endurance or “distance” can be seen and measured. Take a stopwatch with you in the field. When you see the hare (or fox or coyote) get up and the hounds line out, click on the timer. When the game is caught or goes down a hole, or when you see the dogs throw up their heads and give it up, click the watch off. Figuring an average speed of 30 mph — that’s a rough estimate but a pretty good one — then a 30 second course is a quarter mile long; a 1 minute course is a 1/2 mile long; a 2 minute course 1 mile long; a 3 minute course 1 1/2 miles; a 4 minute course 2 miles, etc. Try it and see how many of those “three mile” runs turn out to be a mile and a half.

     A diverse pack of two or three good hounds will catch more hares and will catch a stronger hare than a one dimensional pack. A trio of track greyhounds will usually overhaul a jack quickly and force it into a half dozen turns within a quarter mile. This is usually not enough to tire the hare; she keeps dodging and the hounds tire first and away she goes laughing. Three long distance salukis may lack the speed to work the hare hard in the first half mile. With unlimited running room they might still wear the hare down in time, but running room is seldom unlimited. Somewhere out there — one mile, two miles — the hare goes through a fence or into some cover or down a hole and your salukis have lost the race.

     This is not meant to disparage the greyhound or the saluki; some greyhounds can go the distance and some salukis have very good early speed. But I’ve had my best success over the years running a good sprint dog with two dogs of great distance. The sprinter pushes the hare hard for the first half mile, forces turns, and takes the edge off her. The distance dogs lay off a bit and play the angles; when they sense the sprinter start to falter they pick up the pace and come on to take over the course and eventually catch the tiring jackrabbit.

     Of course the ideal would be a hound, or brace or trio of hounds, that combine greyhound speed with saluki endurance and perhaps a bit of the strength and tenacity of the staghound. One can never perfectly realize this ideal, but some of us think we are coming close with certain breedings that produce exceptional hybrids or longdogs.

     Controlling pace and negotiating turns and terrain are just several of the factors of intelligent pursuit that hounds will use to catch a jack (or fox or coyote). “Playing the angles” was  referred to; a trailing hound lays off the turn forced by the lead hound; when the hare changes direction the trailer can comes across the angle with scarcely any loss of speed, pick up the lead right behind the hare, while the lead hound necessarily slows to make the sharp turn.


The brindle greyhound is pushing the hare; the saluki and white greyhound are hedging.

 

     “Running cunning” can involve hedging, fanning, herding, or pure guesswork. In hedging, one hound runs on the hare’s flank while the other presses from behind, sharply reducing the quarry’s options for escape. In fanning, three hounds fan out behind the hare (one right behind, two on the flanks) then pinch in for the take. That’s the plan anyway and it shows good hounds can think, but hares can think too and they often, somehow, escape the fan, leaving three hounds scrambling to change direction in a cloud of dust. Herding is my favorite because it’s so rare. I’ve owned just two hounds that could do it well; my first saluki, Max, and surprisingly a tattooed track greyhound named Beulah. Beulah was even better than Max because she had such great speed. Time and again while hunting jacks one loses the race because the hare makes it through a fence or into some brush or other cover. A “herd dog” understands the terrain and knows the hare is trying to make for cover. He (she) will run between the hare and the fence, or cover, and literally “herd” the jack back out into the open field where a catch is available. It doesn’t always work, of course, as some jacks will risk the bite of the herd dog and break for the brush anyway; but time and again I watched Max or Beulah flank a hare, force it from cover or away from a fence, rob the hare of certain escape and save a great course. Finally, “pure guesswork” is a hound that’s gotten lazy and is always running cunning, loping along on the flanks of the chase, hoping the hare will turn his way. Such a hound wants to make a catch without doing any of the work. It sometimes works — some hounds are good guessers — and it’s excusable in an older hound, but in a young dog it means you’ve got a slacker.

     Hounds which run cunning effectively are good hunters — they’ll catch you a jack or fox or coyote that would otherwise escape — but good coursers pour it on right behind the game. Strictly speaking, hunting is a competition setting the hounds against the quarry; coursing is a competition between the hounds using the quarry as a lure. Some of us are more hunters than coursers; others are quite the opposite. If the game escapes, the courser cares not; he was looking at the competition between the hounds. The hunter, however, is pissed; his hounds, running together, lost the course. And the hounds themselves? I think it safe to say that the good ones all share a driving philosophy: run-to-catch!


This is country!  Glenn Thompson photo.

 

     Now that we know something of what it takes to catch a hard jack, here are some ways to go about it.

     You can let your hounds run loose (free coursing) and you follow behind in the pickup, or on horseback; or, you can let the hounds run loose and you follow on foot; or you can walk, keeping the hounds on slip leads. There are advantages to each. When you follow in a vehicle or on horseback then as the race starts you can, within limits, keep up, getting a good view of the whole course. However, you may not own a horse and the condition of the field, or fences, may make driving unfeasible. And the hunter wants to be easy on the land; leaving tire tracks all over may run afoul of good ethics, or the ranch foreman, or the public lands manager in charge of the range. When you run jacks you’ll most often be on foot.

     For me coursing on foot with the hounds is the complete field experience. You’re out in the air and sun (or rain or snow!) getting the benefit of the elements and exercise of your own. This gives a better sense of the hunt. On foot you’re in the best communion with your hounds. When hares are especially plentiful, or when there’s more than five dogs to run, it’s often best to slip your hounds. Otherwise, with hounds scattered over the field, running the many hares at will, you’re apt to have races being run every which-way at once. Your concentration and view of the single course is distracted causing you to lose track of your hounds. With the hounds in the slips you can wait for the rabbit you want and slip certain hounds on the same hare. Two to three hounds on a hare is the best coursing. More than three is not necessarily unsporting (in fact, lots of dogs just tend to get in each others way). But with two or three dogs there is less chance of a high speed collision, and it’s a lot easier to keep track of the hounds and to make note of what each one is doing. That’s part of what makes it interesting.

     Often you’ll be part of a small group walking a distance hunting rabbits; hold some back on leads and have a few out there free coursing, out front hunting on their own helping to find and jump the hare. When you see the jack get up you’ll holler: Rabbit!” or “Hare up!” or “God-damn there she is now!” Then you’ll look for the hounds, out there scattered loose in the field reacting in complete spontaneity as they come in to join the course. You’ll watch with binoculars as they move away; watching the hare as much as the hounds; seeing what kind of hare you’ve got; looking for speed; watching to see if the hare can string the hounds out on the straightaway; anticipating its moves when the hounds get up close. You’ll watch the hounds as well, noticing which hound gets the fast run-up, which hound is running cunning or showing best agility over the terrain, and which has the endurance and heart to continue should the course pass 1000 yards. If the course leads over a hill, or out of sight somehow, you’ll run to the hilltop yourself, or climb a fence post, anything to recover your view of the race. The hare may well escape (better than half do). No matter. You’re in the field with your hounds on a hunt and you got to see the hare and hounds at work. That’s what running jackrabbits is all about.


With family at the first annual Desert Hare Pack Hunt, southwest New Mexico, January 2001.